Este Craciunul – anotimpul pentru a face veselie, a iesi afara si, daca esti singur, incearca sa smulgi oamenii sub vasc inainte de inchiderea carciumilor. Asa ca m-am gandit ca ar fi un moment bun sa analizam una dintre cele mai vechi presupuneri din cartea Barbati impotriva femeilor: femeile pot face sex ori de cate ori doresc, in timp ce barbatii sunt sortiti sa astepte pe margine pana cand fantezia noastra sexuala va cadea asupra lor?

Nu-mi place exemplul barului. In primul rand, si cel mai evident, nu este universal adevarat. Exista femei (si eu sunt una dintre ele) care s-au plimbat pana la baieti in baruri, le-au cerut sex si au fost refuzate. De asemenea, am cunoscut barbati care au reusit sa faca sex rapid si usor cu foarte putin efort.

In al doilea rand, nu numai ca exemplul de bare propune stereotipuri nefolositoare despre barbati (ca isi doresc intotdeauna sex, deoarece biologie si testosteron si grrr), de asemenea, conduce o lovitura de ciocan in stima de sine a oricarei femei care a fost refuzata pentru un zgarcit casual. Sustinerea ca femeile pot face sex doar facand clic pe degetele lor, creeaza femeile excitate pentru o viata de dezamagire si le ofera barbatilor o reputatie la care nu pot trai niciodata.

Dar stiinta spune asa!

Daca sunteti in studii sexuale ciudate, ca mine, probabil va veti gandi la experimentul Russell Clark. In 1978, la Universitatea de Stat din Florida, studentii regiati de Clark (un profesor de psihologie sociala), au abordat la intamplare persoane de sex opus si toti au pus aceeasi intrebare:

“Te-am observat in jurul campusului. Te consider atractiv. Te-ai culca cu mine diseara?”

Niciuna dintre femeile abordate nu a spus „da” acestei propuneri, dar 75% dintre barbati au facut-o. Presupunand ca barbatii nu sunt pur si simplu excitati de propozitii cu cuvinte ingrozitoare, sa vedem de ce ar putea fi cazul.

Clark credea ca exista un motiv evolutiv: femeile au evoluat pentru a fi mai selective cu privire la partenerii lor decat barbatii. El sustine acest lucru, indicand o alta parte a experimentului (care, in mod curios, este mult mai putin citata) ca atunci cand propunerea s-a schimbat in „ati dori sa iesiti cu mine in aceasta seara?” barbatii si femeile au acceptat propunerea in proportii aproximativ egale. Altii au sugerat ca este vorba despre un comportament invatat social: femeile sunt invatate sa nu arate prea „usor”. Cu toate acestea, altii au sugerat ca este vorba mai degraba de aversiunea fata de risc: a spune „da” unui strain excitat deschide femeile catre pericolele potentiale.

Banuiesc ca suntem afectati de o combinatie a acestor factori, dar asta nu conteaza pentru aceasta discutie, pentru ca voi lua concluziile experimentului asa cum s-a citit: femeile vor avea o rata de lovitura mai mare decat barbatii daca se apropie straini si le cere sex.

Tot sexul este la fel?

Deci, fericit vreodata, atunci? Probabil ca eu, si toate celelalte femei, putem alege pur si simplu sa alegem cu cine vrem sa facem sex si – cu putin sau fara efort din partea noastra – sa le aducem in pat, sa ne orgasmam rigide si sa ne incoltim pentru totdeauna in sexul nostru Utopie? Ei bine, nu, evident. Aproape ca nu se spune ca oamenii doresc diferite tipuri de sex. S-ar putea sa-ti placa sa dai cap, in timp ce as prefera daca mi-ai da o slujba de mana. S-ar putea sa-mi placa dur si rapid, in timp ce prietenul meu vrea sa faca o dragoste mult mai blanda. Faptul ca diferim cu totii in preferinte este evident daca ai urmarit vreun film porno, ai citit o carte sau ai vazut vreo interactiune umana vreodata.

Desi exemplul barului pare sa arate femeilor intr-o pozitie foarte privilegiata si puternica – cele care detin cheile regatului sexual, daca doriti – ceea ce este de fapt oferit este un tip de sex foarte limitat: casual, rapid, nu. corzi de sex cu un strain. Acest lucru este problematic, deoarece, chiar daca acceptam propunerea „femeile pot face usor sex” ca adevarate, nu spunem ca femeile isi pot indeplini usor nevoile sexuale , doar ca femeile pot avea acest tip de sex cu usurinta.

I’m happy to admit that women might be less inclined (although not universally disinclined – there are plenty of us on Craiglist too) towards casual sex with strangers, for one or all of the reasons stated above. But that doesn’t mean that men necessarily have stronger sexual desire. It’s possible that all the women approached in the bar are horny, or would love a shag, they just wouldn’t want the kind of shag they’d imagine is on offer when a total stranger approaches them for a quickie.

 Why is this example used?

This experiment has been repeated a few times since the original. You can see fun examples of it on YouTube, and Clark himself repeated it in 1982, and as recently as 1990 (with similar results). Failing any dramatic changes in societal norms around sex, I’d expect the results to be similar if it were repeated today.

But that’s not particularly surprising. The experiment and the bar example both offer a very specific type of sex. The type of sex that, rightly or wrongly, is associated with male desire and fantasy. Whether this is fantasy is biologically led, socially implanted, or simply a massive and mistaken generalisation on our part, it is nevertheless accepted as true, and provides the foundation on which the bar example is built.

escorte mature targu jiu http://joshtrost.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/
escorte la strada baia mare http://sportsplexmgmt.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/
pareri escorte sibiu http://wecanwewillnow.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/
cuni escorte http://artsaffron.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/alba
escorte din neamt http://aquilinidevelopment.ca/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/arad
escorte ianca braila http://ronaldo.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/arges
escorte plopeni http://haygichua.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/bacau
publi 24 escorte craiova http://workcamanabay.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/bihor
escorte deva deva http://kinderhook-ketchup.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/bistrita-nasaud
forum escorte petrosani http://city4city.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/botosani
escorte scato http://chiblogo.info/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/braila
escorte gay pitesti http://jobsinlp.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/botosani/lozna
fetite bucuresti escorte http://karvclothing.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/botosani/lunca
escorte sex in brasov http://rusticdestinations.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/botosani/manoleasa
escorte tm http://prattpackaging.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/botosani/mihai-eminescu
onesti escorte http://argusdownloads.net/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/botosani/mihaileni
escorte din iasi http://exoticdancerratings.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/botosani/mihalaseni
escorte mture http://intelimedia.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/botosani/mileanca
escorte in turnu severin http://wallyturtle.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/botosani/mitoc
nimfomane escorte cluj http://besthypnobirthing.org/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/botosani/nicseni

Seen from this angle, the bar example fruitlessly begs the question, and amounts to no more than saying “men are likely to accept the kind of sex that we think men like”.

This tells us nothing about levels of female sexual desire, or whether we are indeed in a privileged position when it comes to sex. In fact, any attempt to draw conclusions about female sexual need based on a sexual offer defined by male fantasy is as good an example of male privilege as anything else.

I like sex more than some people, but less than others. You like different types of sex to me. There are hundreds of different things that prompt our decision to say “yes” to this particular person but “no” to that one. But whether it’s society, biology, anecdote or sheer loneliness that prompts our sexual interactions, it’s deeply unhelpful to tell women that they are privileged just because they can walk into a bar and have casual sex. It’s much more interesting, surely, to ask: why are we trying to define desire across an entire species by using this one limited sexual option?

Girl on the Net tweets at @girlonthenet, and her dirty book, My Not-So-Shameful Sex Secrets is available from Amazon (and other digital booksellers)