Liberalul de trei ori casatorit, Donald Trump s-a ales in functia de presedinte ales prin votul dreptului religios din spatele sau. Negocierea diavolului pe care conservatorii crestini au facut-o cu Trump este destul de usor de inteles: Ei ignora istoria sa de incontinenta sexuala, inclusiv zvonurile despre o „banda de pipa” literala si el le da mai multa putere asupra vietii sexuale a persoanelor private, in special a tinerilor. iar femeile. In functie, presedintele Trump a facut doar asta, lansand o multitudine de atacuri la avortul legal si accesul contraceptiei.
Acum se pare ca se deschide un al treilea front in razboiul Trumpian in viata sexuala a altor persoane: intoarcerea educatiei doar pentru abstinenta, pe care multi americani cred ca au disparut dupa ce presedintele George W. Bush a parasit functia. Ei bine, editia doar cu abstinenta revine, dar de data aceasta, sustinatorii acesteia spera ca alegatorii, in special parintii, nu observa intoarcerea in sala de clasa a propagandei religioase anti-sex.
[salon_video id = “14778147”]
Primul semn ca administratia Trump a sperat sa usureze in clasa mai multe mesaje care nu spun sex, a venit la sfarsitul lunii mai, cand Casa Alba a propus un buget care sa reduca aproape toate cheltuielile guvernamentale, dar care sa creasca cu 277 milioane de dolari cheltuieli pentru programele de abstinenta pana la casatorie. Stirile de saptamana trecuta au iesit la iveala ca Valerie Huber, seful unei organizatii pro-abstinenta numita Ascend, se va alatura Departamentului Sanatatii si Serviciilor Umane in calitate de sef de personal la secretarul asistent pentru sanatatea adolescentilor; pozitia ii va permite sa solicite mai mult sprijin pentru programele de abstinenta pana la casatorie in scoli.
Pentru a fi clar, doar edintia abstinenta nu a fost niciodata complet morta. Administratia Obama a depus multe eforturi pentru a scapa de finantarea federala pentru programele axate pe abstinenta, iar unele au avut succes. Dar republicanii de la congres au reusit sa pastreze cel putin o finantare centrata pe abstinenta si, deoarece programele de educatie sexuala sunt controlate in cea mai mare parte de consiliile scolare locale, programele de abstinenta au continuat sa infloreasca in multe districte scolare. Conservatorii religiosi au continuat sa-i impinga in scoli sub nasul parintilor, care altfel s-ar putea revolta la auzul ca copiii lor sunt supusi unor programe care rusineaza 95% din americanii care au sex premarital si care au fost in mod repetat legate de rate mai mari de adolescenti. sarcinii.
Publicitate:
O parte din ceea ce a pastrat in viata doar abstinenta este ca dreptul religios l-a rebransat ca „evitare a riscurilor sexuale”, ca si cum ar fi o initiativa de sanatate publica in loc de rusine sexuala tentata de religie.
„De-a lungul anilor au devenit foarte destepti”, a explicat Debra Hauser, presedintele Avocatilor pentru Tineret, intr-o conversatie telefonica. „Cand am fost ca„ stiinta asupra ideologiei ”, s-au intors si au produs propriile lor jurnale si propria stiinta. .“
Ea a adaugat: „Cand am spus,„ Acesta este un program doar-spune-nu, care nu a functionat pentru droguri sub Nancy Reagan si nu va functiona aici ”, au spus:„ Nu, aceasta nu este abstinenta pana la casatorie ; subliniaza doar abstinenta. ” S-au intors si au mers in aceasta limba despre „evitarea riscurilor sexuale”, care obstructioneaza complet ceea ce fac de fapt. ”
Odata cu numirea lui Huber, acest rebranding si controlul republican al celor trei ramuri ale guvernului, exista motive intemeiate sa va temeti de o apasare reinnoita pentru ca scolile sa terorizeze copiii despre sex, mai degraba decat pentru a oferi o educatie sexuala adevarata.
Mary Anne Mosack, care a inlocuit-o pe Valerie Huber in functia de sef al Ascend (numita anterior Asociatia Nationala a Educatiei Abstinentei), a aparut in timpul unui interviu telefonic cu implicatia ca „evitarea riscurilor sexuale” este stilul de educatie just-say-no care il critica. cum spune Hauser ca este.
„Invatam ca [casatoria] este cel mai bun context pentru activitatea sexuala”, a spus Mosack, insistand in repetate randuri ca acest lucru nu inseamna ca abordarea organizatiei sale este un program de abstinenta pana la casatorie.
Conversatia mea cu Mosack, care a durat aproape o jumatate de ora, a fost innebunit eliptica despre exact obiectivele programului. Am subliniat in mod repetat ca varsta medie a SUA pentru prima casatorie este de 28 de ani – la 11 ani dupa varsta medie pentru prima relatie sexuala – si am intrebat daca nu este realista si, probabil, nesanatoasa, sa te astepti ca tinerii sa astepte atat de mult. a face sex. Mosack a respins intrebarea, incercand sa redirectioneze conversatia de la adulti mai tineri la adolescenti. Ea a spus ca obiectivul principal al Ascend a fost „normalizarea … intarzierii sexuale” pentru adolescenti, adaugand: „Vorbim despre scoala medie si liceu”.
Insa, atunci cand am intrebat-o daca scopul programelor este ca tinerii sa astepte pana cand, sa spunem, la facultate inainte de a se implica in activitati sexuale, ea a spus ca, nu, Ascend crede ca virginitatea pana la casatorie este „cel mai bun rezultat”. Si apoi in jur am mers din nou.
Pozitia lui Mosack, daca sunt generoasa, parea sa fie ca daca le spui tinerilor sa astepte 15 ani, poate poti spera ca asteapta cinci ani – sau trei. Pentru mine asta suna mai putin ca educatie si mai mult ca sa infiintam copii pentru esec. Cu siguranta nu mi s-a parut o modalitate buna de a incadra sexualitatea umana, care ar trebui sa fie in cele din urma despre placere si legatura umana, nu este descrisa in termeni care seamana puternic cu ideea crestina a pacatului. Si, de asemenea, nu pare o modalitate buna de a transmite informatii despre sanatate de care tinerii vor avea nevoie atunci cand incep inevitabil sa faca sex.
„Nu faceti greseala, exista inca o tema de baza a rusinii, fricii si folosirii stereotipurilor si rolurilor traditionale de gen” in aceste programe rebrandate, a spus Hauser.
Mosack disagreed with Hauser’s position, insisting that the programs take a “holistic approach” to sex education.
I asked Mosack for some examples of curricula that her organization endorses, so I could see it for myself. At this point she got cagey. While her organization has certified hundreds of programs, she said, she wouldn’t give me any names or contact information, instead she said would pass my number along so that representatives of those programs could contact me. (No one has.)
It didn’t take much digging, however, to find a 2016 Ascend document that featured an extensive list of programs the organization had deemed successful “sexual risk avoidance” examples; many of the programs continue to use the “abstinence” language in their titles.
It just so happens that many of the Ascend-recommended programs were reviewed in 2016 by the Texas Freedom Network, which advocates for the separation of church and state and resists religion-tinged and anti-sex propaganda being pushed as “education” in schools.
Texas Freedom Network found that reframing abstinence-only programs as “sexual risk avoidance” led to a few minor improvements over the Bush-era programs. The amount of outright misinformation about contraception has declined and the programs have thankfully started to incorporate important information about consent. But the review still found that the programs demonize contraception. Much of the shaming and sexist messaging that gave abstinence-only education a bad name in the first place is still a major feature of the programs.
For instance, two Ascend-recommended programs — REAL Essentials and Choosing the Best — continue to teach that having sex makes a person dirty and incapable of falling in love.
“REAL Essentials explains that glue (i.e., sex) is a bonding agent that works best on a surface that is ‘clean and dry’ (i.e., virgins),” the Texas Freedom Network report read. “Choosing the Best includes a similar exercise using adhesive tape. The exercise involves placing tape on a student’s skin, then removing it to show what has transferred from the skin to the tape. What remains on the tape is supposed to represent the emotional baggage resulting from sex.”
The idea of the exercise, of course, is to suggest that people who have sex become dirty and incapable of “sticking” to new partners.
escorte din berceni http://www.freedback.com/thank_you.php?u=https://escortelux.vip/
escorte resta http://yumi.rgr.jp/puku-board/kboard.cgi?mode=res_html&owner=proscar&url=escortelux.vip/
escorte drumul tabereo http://members.ascrs.org/sso/logout.aspx?returnurl=https://escortelux.vip/
escorte bm https://aecinfo.aecdaily.com/index.php?url=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/alba
escorte bulevardul timisoara http://email.nacsonline.com/redir.aspx?src=home57&url=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/arad
escorte bondage https://www1.arbitersports.com/Content/HideMobileAlerts.aspx?redirectUrl=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/arges
escorte baa mare https://www.mcponline.org/cgi/adclick/?ad=1&adclick=true&url=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/bacau
anunturi escorte gorj http://regiszotar.sztaki.hu/redir.php?url=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/bihor
escorte drumetului https://www.stateparks.com/confirm/tracker.asp?u=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/bistrita-nasaud
escorte mature barlad https://cdn.embedded.com/common/jumplink.php?target=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/botosani
publi24 escorte deva http://link.dropmark.com/r?url=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/braila
escorte cluj 2016 https://www.searchpoint.net/redir.asp?reg_id=pTypes&sname=%2Fsearch.asp&lid=1&sponsor=RES&url=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/cluj/aghiresu
publi 24 buzau escorte https://salsa.wiredforchange.com/dia/track.jsp?key=-1&url_num=10&url=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/cluj/aiton
escorte oradea karla http://lecanardduzonard.toile-libre.org/redirect.php?type=lien&n=444&adresse=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/cluj/alunis
escorte dulci.ro http://japan.rurubu.com/Yado/jump.asp?ac=IA-15Q-0036S&rurl=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/cluj/apahida
escorte pitestu https://www.vingle.net/redirect?url=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/cluj/aschileu
escorte zepter https://blog.ss-blog.jp/_pages/mobile/step/index?u=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/cluj/baciu
escorte braila site:nimfomane.com http://localbusiness.nwfdailynews.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=escortelux.vip/escorte/cluj/baisoara
publi24 escorte petrosani http://www.pp.catholic.org.au/__newsletter/13173/a25b807744e50406128732d17400531d/external?url=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/cluj/belis
lugoj escorte https://exam.tpu.ru/redirect?url=https://escortelux.vip/escorte/cluj/bobalna
The reviewers also found sexist stereotypes in Ascend-recommended programs like Scott and White Wellness and Sexual Health (formerly called Worth the Wait) and REAL Essentials. Their curricula framed men as sexual and women as romantic, treating marriage as a tense exchange whereby a woman provides access to her body in exchange for a man’s pledge of love.
In reality, of course, people of all genders experience both sexual desire and romantic yearnings — and the two are not experienced in opposition, for most people.
With the deceitful rebranding of abstinence-only programs and the Republican domination of government, there’s more than enough reason for parents to worry that these misleading, shaming programs will return to public school curricula. In many cases they’ve been there all along, despite the Obama administration’s efforts to kill off abstinence-only programs.
That doesn’t mean parents are powerless in this regard. In fact, Hauser argued, fighting for real sex education is a good avenue for people looking for opportunities to resist the Trump agenda.
“At the school-district level is where sex education is determined, both in policy and in practice,” Hauser explained. That means that as few as five or six parents, can often be enough to convince a superintendent to reject federal pressure or funding to replace real sex education with abstinence-only, she said.
The kids themselves can be the resistance’s best ally. They can be warned that schools may bring in activists from crisis pregnancy centers and other religious right organizations. Or students can cautioned to be on the lookout for anti-sex lectures that feature things like the tape stunt or similar ones involving chewing gum or cups of spit. The list of Ascend-approved curricula can serve as a cheat sheet for parents: If your kid comes home with abstinence-only books, it’s time to call the school and raise hell.
